Multi-cloud redundancy distributes services across multiple cloud providers and on-premises infrastructure to reduce dependency on any single vendor's backbone. This approach protects against provider-wide outages that internal regional failover alone cannot prevent.
Multi-Provider Cloud Redundancy
When you're talking about the major cloud providers like Amazon Web Services, you can really have all of the redundancy in the world. That is, we can geographically spread things out. We can have different servers running things with different services like RDS running. There's a lot of different ways we can create redundancy within the system, and it really helps us set these up. But the problem is it still resides on the backbone of Amazon Web Services, and if there's something wrong with that, it can cause other problems as well. So one consideration is that we actually split our services amongst different providers, so we can have some sort of provider redundancy.
One of the SaaS companies that I worked for had millions of users, and they were relying on those services to be up and running. What we had in Amazon Web Services is our services in the Oregon region, but just as a backup, we had a lot of the services being able to fail over to the Virginia region. There was a problem in the Virginia region. Our main servers weren't over there, but a lot of AWS services reside on S3 and specifically from Virginia. So when the Virginia site had an issue, about a 6-hour outage/issue, then some of our services went a little wonky. Thankfully it didn't cause big problems to our customers, but it potentially really could have. There were these issues because it was all part of the same provider.
So perhaps there are times that we want to guard against this by distributing our services amongst multiple providers. Here are some of the major players in the space: an Amazon Web Services, a Microsoft Azure, and a Google Cloud. What we could do is distribute amongst these, or even our own location, or maybe a colocation, or one of these providers here. Just a reminder what the on-premise or location would be: the colocation, which would be another entity, not like Amazon Web Services, where we go and set up our own equipment there, or infrastructure as a service, so this would be like the AWSs and the Microsoft Azures.
Maybe perhaps I want to distribute amongst multiple and have some colocation where I have full control over it, but in case something goes wrong I can fail over to a cloud provider. So what might that look like? Maybe I have some sort of colocation that I rent and I have my equipment there, and then I could fail over to a site one, which would be a cloud provider one. Maybe this is Google Cloud. Or maybe I also have some on-premise equipment, so as a last-case scenario I could always fail over to this on-premise, this stuff that I control internally, and so I have a lot of control over it. This is just one example where I could have multiple sites here and have it located at different providers.
TechKnowSurge builds IT and cybersecurity professionals through hands-on, concept-first training built around real understanding — not memorization. Free interactive tools, structured programs, and 25+ years of real-world experience, all in one place.
Explore free tools and programs →